Re: Packaging shell functions
"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <email@example.com> writes:
> Michael Welle wrote:
>> I'm packaging a little tool called vared. Vared relies on some shell
>> functions and/or aliases that must have been sourced into the
>> environment before usage. What may be the best pratice to package
>> such shell functions?
> I would take a look on packaging of 'apparix' tool, it relies on shell
> aliases too for its work.
the user have to copy and paste shell code fragments that are
generated by the apparix binary. This way no person can harm the
packaging guy if some config files are gone south ;).
biff4emacsen - A biff-like tool for (X)Emacs
Flood - Your friendly network packet generator