Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 01:05:42PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:43:10PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Hi fellow developers,
>> Please someone help look at bug#494422.
>> What is wrong with my judgement?
>you are totaly misinformed as usual,
Perhaps uninformed - thanks to your one-liner bug-closures
>don't mess with bugs you have zero knownledge with.
I promise you that I won't ever do that, and claim that I have never
ever done so before in my entire life.
What was the relevance of your remark? Did you perhaps forget a smiley?
>> It seems to me that bug#494422 origins as the fix for bug#356850
>> Generally I am worried about initramfs-tools being so invasive (see
>> bug#494422 - especially Max seemingly recommending to reinstall from
>> time to time - slowly upgrading is not expected to work).
>kernel-img.conf(5) has nothing to do with initramfs-tools.
>there you'll find do_bootloader documented.
You mean this?:
> If set to NO, this prevents the postinst from running the boot
> loader. Defaults to Yes.
So do_bootloader is a flag solely for the use by Linux kerne packages'
If this issue is unrelated to initramfs-tools, why did you close it?
Why not reassign to the proper package instead?
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----