TK>> Quoting Steve Langasek (vorlon@debian.org): TK>>> This is far below the quality I expect from a mass bug filing that's been TK>>> reviewed by debian-devel. Mass bugfilings at RC severity need to be held TK>>> to TK>> TK>> Even though I overread the thread when Dmitry posted his intent to TK>> -devel, I feel like there was *no* strong agreement that this MBF was TK>> really wished and welcomed. TK> Yes, this mass bug filing is of bad quality and should not have happened as TK> such. However: TK>> If I come on any such bug on packages I maintain or co-maintain, I TK>> will immediately downgrade the bug report in such way, mentally TK>> thanking the bug submitter for the extra work and ranting about yet TK>> another nice method to delay the release. TK> I would like to ask maintainers not to do this. I've quickly checked just a TK> number of these bugs and, between the false positives, already found a TK> handfull of genuine, true positive issues. Checking where the bug comes from TK> usually doesn't take a lot of time, so while I share the annoyance, you are TK> already annoyed, so better turn it into something useful by double-checking TK> the code rather than downgrading them out of hand. Thank You for your encouragement :) More 10 packages already patched and uploaded :) All, please again, be understanding to possible mistakes. :) -- . ''`. Dmitry E. Oboukhov : :’ : unera@debian.org `. `~’ GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21 `- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555 E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature