Re: On changelogs and version tracking
Don Armstrong <email@example.com> wrote:
> Be careful when you reorder or add back changelog entries. If you
> return to a previous version by means of an epoch (or something else)
> you can either just tack the new upload/version at the top of the
> changelog or elide the other entries in the changelog, and continue on
> as before. Changelog entries should always be in upload order (which
> presumably corresponds to chronological order) with the version upon
> which this upload is based on immediately preceeding it.
What is the proper way to merge branches?
When upstream branches off a new development version I sometimes do
they same in Debian, uploading upstream's development version to
experimental while keeping stable in sid. Once upstream makes a major
release I make an upload, based on the code in experimental.
Obviously I do not want to lose either experimental or sid changelog
Sorting cronologically seems to be wrong, since experimental and sid
entries would get mixed up, therefore I go for sorting by debian
version numbers. Is this broken?
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'