Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 02:07:43PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Mike Bird]
> > No one objected to having apt decide by giving priority
> > precedence over lexical:
> It sounds good until you notice just how many dependency resolvers we
> have floating around. dselect, apt, aptitude, pbuilder, sbuild - at
> least. Don't know if synaptic has its own or borrows from libapt.
Also, even if no one objected, no one has volunteered to implement this
Amending apt's resolver to prefer packages with a higher priority is a good
goal, but I don't think it should be a blocker for improving our m-t-a
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/