Stephen Gran wrote: > Please no. The layout of /srv/ is specifically said to be undetermined, > so we can't actually rely on any paths in /srv/. I think the current > setup is fairly good, actually - by default simple site layouts work out > of the box, and don't interfere with more complicated setups that are > free to use arbitrary hierarchies in /srv. A problem with not encouraging admins to put their data in /srv by default is that while backing up /srv is easy, finding the right directories to back up in /var is harder (especially when they're non-fhs ones like /var/www). -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature