Hi,
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 13:26 +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 02:55:25AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> > Yes. My webservers tend to use something like
> > /srv/www/<sitename>/{config,cgi-bin,htdocs,lib,logs,blah,blah}/ as the
> > normal layout. Exposing /srv/www as a document root would give access to
> > lots of things that are not public in many cases - we tend to not bother
> > with .htaccess files since config/ and so on are not under the webroot.
>
> You're not alone with such a setup. /srv is becoming popular exactly
> because it does not conflict with the OS.
>
> Quoting the FHS:
>
> "This main purpose of specifying this is so that _users_ may
> find the location of the data files for particular service, ..."
>
> Note how it only talks about users, not the operating
> system/distribution.
>
> Gabor
I would say that the redhat default of /srv/www/localhost/htdocs might
be a good option.
William
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part