Re: Xen status in lenny?
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:44:53AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:23:19AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:08:43AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:04:45AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > > right but still no excuse to bring in a patch set that is *known*
> > > > to not be merged upstream.
> > > So OpenVZ is also out of reach.
> > openvz is actively working on namespace merge and using the emerging
> > bits. their patchsize is decreasing.
> Which does not change the fact that the patch in this form will never be
sure patchsets of such size are never gobed in *one* step.
here you'll find a nice metric on their merge success: