[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Xen status in lenny?

]] maximilian attems 

| On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:45:21AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
| > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 05:34:28PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
| > > That SLES forward-port for 2.6.26 is not acceptable based on Debian kernel
| > > patch policy: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
| > 
| > Which is only the case for the main images. We have support for
| > additional feature sets, which have less strict rules.
| right but still no excuse to bring in a patch set that is *known*
| to not be merged upstream.

Of course it is when it is to prevent a fairly substantial regression
from etch.  Whether etch should have shipped a dom0 or not is a
different question and a little late to complain about now; we just have
to do the best we can with what we have.

Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are

Reply to: