[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers



On Thursday 17 July 2008, richs wrote:
> I can assure you that on an http download i386 iso, m-a is not.
> http://atterer.net/jigdo/jigdo-search.php?q=module-assistant+_i386

You really need to check your facts better. If you use the links I 
provided and just search the pages:

http://atterer.net/jigdo/jigdo-search.php?q=build-essential&l=http%3A%2F%2Fcdimage.debian.org%2Fcdimage%2Frelease%2F4.0_r3%2Fi386%2Fjigdo-cd%2Fdebian-40r3-i386-CD-1.jigdo
17 Feb 2008;Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 r3 "Etch" - Official i386 CD Binary-1 
20080217-11:50 (20080217)
pool/main/m/module-assistant/module-assistant_0.10.8_all.deb
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-686_2.6.18+6etch3_i386.deb
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.18+6etch3_i386.deb
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.18-6-686_2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1_i386.deb
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.18-6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1_i386.deb
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.18-6-486_2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1_i386.deb

http://atterer.net/jigdo/jigdo-search.php?q=build-essent&l=http%3A%2F%2Fcdimage.debian.org%2Fcdimage%2Flenny_di_beta2%2Fi386%2Fjigdo-cd%2Fdebian-LennyBeta2-i386-CD-1.jigdo
07 Jun 2008;Debian GNU/Linux LennyBeta2 "Lenny" - Official Beta i386 CD 
Binary-1 20080607-17:43 (20080607)
pool/main/m/module-assistant/module-assistant_0.10.11.0_all.deb
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-686_2.6.24+13_i386.deb
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.24+13_i386.deb
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-686_2.6.24-7_i386.deb
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-common_2.6.24-7_i386.deb
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486_2.6.24-7_i386.deb
(link for the Lenny Beta2 CD was wrong in my previous mail)

I'll let you check the weekly images yourself.

It looks like the search you tried is just broken.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: