Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages
On 15/07/08 at 10:33 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 09:53:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 12/07/08 at 18:50 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
> > > because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
> > > lintian.d.o's results or the archive rebuild's results I can't even
> > > estimate the number of affected packages.
>
> > > [3] At least aboot's is missing, already notified Lucas.
>
> > aboot is listed in Packages-arch-specific[1] as being for alpha only, so
> > I'm not trying to build it.
>
> The binary is listed in P-a-s. The source package builds multiple binaries,
> including some on archs other than alpha.
>
> So your parsing of P-a-s does not match that used by wanna-build, which
> understands this and successfully passes aboot to the autobuilders.
Right, should be fixed now.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: