[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?

Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes:

> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 07:48:27PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU> writes:
>> > Speaking of the -g option, does anyone know off-hand whether or not
>> > it's worth it to build with -g3 (to get cpp macro definitions into the
>> > DWARF stubs)?
>> -g3 is also needed to get sane debugging information for C++ code,
>> IME.  It would be nice if it was the default, unless there's huge
>> overhead in terms of bloating up the DWARF2 .debug_* sections.
> I've always found -g to be enough with mozilla and webkit c++ code
> bases. What would -g3 add ?

Correct line numbers when dealing with inline templates, for one.
There were some other niceties, but I can't recall what they were off
the top of my head.


  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux             http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?       http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-    GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.

Attachment: pgpvvpPFNenYI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: