Re: ITP: debian-backports-keyring -- GnuPG archive key of the backports.org repository
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:34:31PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > The real issue is not that you [Francesco Poli] were posting without
> > disclaimers.
> The issue that led to those disclaimers was *exactly* that some
> thought Francesco should make it clear he is not speaking officially.
Well, it's the same thing really - adding the disclaimers is one (poor)
way of addressing...
> > When someone posts to debian-legal asking for help figuring out if a
> > license is ok for Debian main, and you respond saying that it isn't
> > because of license feature X; and you are well aware that the
> > ftpmasters have previously and consciously accepted other licenses
> > into main with that same feature, and have not been swayed by your
> > arguments; that's not appropriate.
...the problems with him making statements that sound more authorative
than they should be.
> Perhaps so. But that's not the issue that led to Francesco habitually
> appending disclaimers to his messages.
Ideally there'd be no need for such disclaimers because the content of
posts wouldn't create misleading impressions.
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."