Re: bashism question

[Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>]

ke, 2008-06-25 kello 08:47 +0100, Adam D. Barratt kirjoitti:
> Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [...]
> > The next release of checkbashisms will include a "--posix" flag which
> > will allow the non-POSIX behaviours permitted by policy to be flagged.
> > Currently neither set of "local" checks flags "local x, y"; I seem to
> > remember there being a discussion relating to that syntax on the
> > -policy list a while ago but need to check whether it reached any
> > conclusions.
> 
> Actually, ignore that. I was thinking of "local a b" which policy explicitly 
> says can't be relied upon.

To clarify: is "local foo=bar" policy-compliant or not?

(If not, *sigh*.)