On Friday 13 June 2008 18:22, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Luca Capello (luca@pca.it): > > As explained at [1], I'm in the process of renaming the binary package > > cl-hunchentoot to hunchentoot to more closely follow upstream. Since > > cl-hunchentoot is not in Etch, if I'm not wrong the new transitional > > package can be dropped as soon as Lenny is released. > > > > I'll proceed in the following way for debian/control: rename > > cl-hunchentoot to hunchentoot and then create the transitional binary > > package cl-hunchentoot which depends on hunchentoot. > > > > Is this OK? Do I need something else? > > IMHO, once you get a complete answer, adding this to the DevRef > (assuming it is not already there) could be a good idea. BTW, there is also http://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.