[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Large data packages in the archive

I demand that Alexander E. Patrakov may or may not have written...

> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> That already has a problem: How to define "large"? One way, which we
>> chose for now, is simply "everything > 50MB".

> Random thought: some architecture-dependent -dbg packages are also > 50 MB
> in size. Shouldn't they get some special treatment, too?

-Zlzma? :-)

| Darren Salt    | linux or ds at              | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army
| + Burn less waste. Use less packaging. Waste less.     USE FEWER RESOURCES.

Necessity is the mother of invention.

Reply to: