Re: what about an special QA package priority?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/20/08 23:11, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[🔎] 483389AD.5020708@cox.net> you wrote:
>> even though it's "just" a command line utility. Who knows what
>> weird, unexpected side effects there might be from running such an
>> app within a tight bash loop.
>
> none*. And not cleaning up yourself also improves performance for short
> running apps.
How so?
> Gruss
> Bernd
>
> * unless we talk persistent resources like files or ipc.
That's the point. And what if there's a kernel (or would that be a
glibc?) bug?
Since you can't know the future of your software (more than once,
I've seen a one-off script or program morph-expand into an important
and much larger app) or the OS it will run on in the future, it's
always good to clean up after yourself.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
ESPN makes baseball players better.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFINCb2S9HxQb37XmcRAq4WAKCd+UGDDIKarUy7YuznusgS1ZxIeACfadoc
3uC4lFzrlrkckOFSJtJWJbQ=
=Z30s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: