Re: what about an special QA package priority?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 05/20/08 18:42, Nicolas François wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 05:21:07PM -0300, Luciano Bello wrote:
>> For example:
>> - It should be checked with debugging tools (like valgrind :P)
> It's not always needed.
> It may show some bad practices, but having a command line utility which
> allocate some resources (memory, syslog, files, PAM, ...) and does not
> free them directly (i.e. it relies on system to do the cleanup on exit) is
> not an issue.
Still, though, it's Bad Practice not to clean up after yourself,
even though it's "just" a command line utility. Who knows what
weird, unexpected side effects there might be from running such an
app within a tight bash loop.
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
ESPN makes baseball players better.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----