[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: divergence from upstream as a bug

Please follow <URL:http://www.debian.org/MailingLists#codeofconduct>
and avoid sending messages individually to someone when the message is
also sent to the list, unless they ask for it.

Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> writes:

> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 06:01:19AM +0000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > The Debian BTS is already on the list of places to go for
> > information about Debian package changes. The proposal in this
> > thread doesn't increase that.
>   For _debian_ packagers yes. But such a tool would be useful for
> upstreams, and form them it *is* one another place to look at. And
> most wont, because for large upstreams, there's this huge userbase
> you see, and the huge number of downstreams, and huge number of
> downstreams issue trackers. They can't look at them all.

So it's already the case that they have a certain number of places to
look, *including* the Debian BTS if the work is packaged for Debian. I
don't see that this proposal changes that.

 \            "Program testing can be a very effective way to show the |
  `\        presence of bugs, but is hopelessly inadequate for showing |
_o__)                              their absence." —Edsger W. Dijkstra |
Ben Finney

Reply to: