Re: divergence from upstream as a bug

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: divergence from upstream as a bug
From: Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 11:14:21 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080518091421.GB17277@bee.dooz.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080517222434.GA850@xanadu.blop.info>
References: <[🔎] 20080517210108.GB22799@kodama.kitenet.net> <[🔎] 20080517222434.GA850@xanadu.blop.info>

On Sun, May 18, 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> (This discussion is similar to the one about DEPs vs BTS bugs -- a
> discussion on the BTS would always miss a "summary".)

 I didn't follow this discussion, but it strikes me that many bug
 trackers have a summary for bugs.

-- 
Loïc Minier

Reply to:

References:
- divergence from upstream as a bug
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: divergence from upstream as a bug
  - From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>

Prev by Date: Re: divergence from upstream as a bug
Next by Date: Re: Packages using VCS but with no 'Vcs-*' control field
Previous by thread: Re: divergence from upstream as a bug
Next by thread: Re: divergence from upstream as a bug
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread