Re: How to handle Debian patches
On Sat, 17 May 2008, George Danchev wrote:
> On Saturday 17 May 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > This is exactly what happened in the openssl case (modulo
> > ./debian/patches).
> Not true. openssl packaging didn't and still does not use clearly
> identified diff files in debian/patches/.
Uh... that's why Manoj said "modulo ./debian/patches"
> > Indeed, this is already the recommendation: use pristine upstream,
> > unless they have added non-dfsg materials, or something, and _all_
> > debian changes live in the diff.gz.
> A large number of packages do not follow that simple rule, but
> patching the orig.tar.gz instead.
Which packages are these, and why aren't there bugs filed about this?
"Ban cryptography! Yes. Let's also ban pencils, pens and paper, since
criminals can use them to draw plans of the joint they are casing or
even, god forbid, create one time pads to pass uncrackable codes to
each other. Ban open spaces since criminals could use them to converse
with each other out of earshot of the police. Let's ban flags since
they could be used to pass secret messages in semaphore. In fact let's
just ban all forms of verbal and non-verbal communication -- let's see
those criminals make plans now!"