Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
Mike Bird <mgb-debian@yosemite.net> writes:
> All of the MTA's provide mail-transport-agent. I had assumed that apt
> would choose between them on the basis that exim4-daemon-light is the
> only provider with priority standard, the others being optional or extra.
>
> If apt does not consider package priorities in resolving disjunctions,
> a possible solution would be for apt to do so.
+1
This solution seems superior to my next choice, the introduction of a
'sensible-mta' package (to be used much as the OP's suggestion of
'default-mta').
--
\ "Ice Water? Get some onions - that'll make your eyes water!" |
`\ -- Groucho Marx |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
Reply to: