On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 12:27:29PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Please change this to a package name that is less generic, and
> conforms with other OCaml library packages. 'libres-ocaml' would be
> better.
This is the source package name, as in all ITPs, not the binary package
name. No OCaml package has a source name like libFOO-ocaml, they all
have *binaries* called libFOO-ocaml-dev.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -<%>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature