Re: Extending the update-rc.d API to change runlevel and disable scripts?
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:15:27AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Similarly, a counter action for this new "disable" action should be
> provided. I frequently dig into postinsts to retrieve the info about in
> which position I should put back a service I've disabled. (Sure this
> won't be needed with dependency based boot system, but in the meantime
> it still is.)
Isn't this just a matter of stopping the service and renaming the S (K)
links to s (k) links so one can easily revert?