Re: Proposing a new source control header to link to upstream BTSs
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Maybe a better place for Tincho's idea would be an (optional)
> debian/bugtracker file (similar to debian/watch).
An important concern is that these sorts of files don't actually
change with the source package, they change whenever the upstream
changes them. The right approach is something like mole or CRMI
instead which is connected with the source package, but changes on its
own schedule.
http://wiki.debian.org/Mole
http://wiki.debian.org/CRMI
Don Armstrong
--
Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did, we'd be
running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and listening to
repetitive music.
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: