Re: Unsupported? (Was: Bug#468183: ITP: monkey -- small webserver based on the HTTP/1.1 protocol)
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
unsupported.d.n could be the right place for packages that are "not
good enough for Debian (yet)".
Is there any reason why a Debian should spend resources to maintain
things that are not good enough for Debian? For the "not good enough
_yet_" there is experimental. I don't mind if somebody else wants to
register "to-bad-for-debian.org" but I also would love if people would
discuss such issues on a mailing list of this domain.