[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: conditional dependency?

This one time, at band camp, Petter Reinholdtsen said:
> [Stephen Gran]
> > I really hope that's not true.  There are many useful use cases for
> > static linking when you're building for constrained or otherwise not
> > quite sane environments that IMHO we should continue to support.
> > Since in the main it's not that hard to do the right thing, it's
> > also of limited value to discourage it.
> It is worth to note that glibc do not work properly with static
> linking.  All functions using PAM and NSS do not work, so binaries
> using such functions will fail when presented with incompatible
> modules on disk.

That's pretty much always been the case with at least NSS, by design.
That being said, the interface to nss hasn't particularly changed in so
long I'm not sure this is an issue, in practice.
|   ,''`.                                            Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :                                        sgran@debian.org |
|  `. `'                        Debian user, admin, and developer |
|    `-                                     http://www.debian.org |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: