On Wed Feb 06 12:09, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > Again, the discussion isn't (for me) about a tool, but an exchange > > format. We are discussing having patches served in a quilt series, and > > okay, this approach is similar but different. So you want a quilt > series, but not quilt. This means every other utility must be able to > generate this and must support every future quilt has, which itself may > not have. So, effectively you don't actively force them to use sth. but > passiveley you do. The difference is small however. I'd have said that it would be more sensible to define a reasonable subset of quilt features. A set of patches with comments at the top and a series file can be manipulated by many tools, isn't really quilt-specific. Allowing obscure quilt-only features wasn't what I'd understood from the discussion. Anyway, given that many VCSen seem to be gaining quilt-compatible interfaces, it doesn't really seem like forcing people to use quilt. Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature