Hi *, I'm packaging a software for the Debian-Med group (CCed), and found that, even if the library is at version 2.2.1, the compilation makes a libfoo.so.2.0.2 [1]. This is due to the fact that in Makefile.am upstream (CCed) has set: libvista_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 2:2:0 As already discussed in the thread at [1], the numbers get reversed in the file name, so that 2:2:0 becomes 2.0.2. Now the problem is that the third number must be <= the middle one. This means that we can't have a 2:1:2 (so that the filename becomes libfoo.so.2.2.1). Is there any solution to this? If not, is it that important that the filename has the same version number as the package? Kindly, David [1] please have a look at: http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2008/01/msg00207.html -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature