Hi Sebastian, * Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@hartwork.org> [2008-01-15 15:58]: > -- rm > i noticed this bug [1] is the only wnpp bug using > the type "rm" for removal. is this an official > type that scripts talking to BTS should support? > is it documented somewhere? is it a bug in the bug > report? In general this is only used to express why the package should be removed without forcing people to read the whole bug log. I think supporting the possible RM tags would be nice. The meanings are explained on: http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.html (top of the page) > -- ita > i noticed the "intent to adopt" tag is not mentioned > on [2] though used frequently. is this on purpose? I guess yes since this part is about adding a new wnpp bug. And adding a bug with ITA as tag does not make much sense. It is documented on http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l3. > if not can somebody witha free minute add it? > i don't have write access to that page. It may not hurt to add it with an explanation on the wnpp site. Just file a wishlist bug against www.debian.org if you want this. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
Attachment:
pgpHe4FmNiqCF.pgp
Description: PGP signature