[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

ldbl128 transition for liborbit2 could be omitted


looking at why ORBit hadn’t been updated to the latest upstream version,
I noticed there is an open RC bug about the ldbl128 transition. Given
the number of rdeps (373), this is a huge beast to update.

However, looking at the headers, I can see that in fact, it can probably
be avoided. The basic long double type, which is used by all structures,
is the following:
	typedef gdouble   CORBA_long_double;

This is a clear violation of the CORBA specification, but the result for
us is that this transition should not be necessary.

Is it OK to close this bug, or am I missing something?
: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Reply to: