[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: netconf control socket protocol: rfc822, xml-rpc, or dbus

also sprach Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> [2008.01.09.2229 +0100]:
> > The alternative is to have the control socket use the D-Bus system, 
> > meaning only one package is needed, but messages
> > would need to pass through the dbus-daemon in order to be recieved.
>   Well that wasn't what I understood, but I'm really not a D-Bus expert
> at all :) Though it doesn't makes sense to let the D-Bus connector be a
> separated component as you then only pull the library which is of a
> reasonable size.

This is what I initially wanted, but then figured I'd rather reuse
existing code than implement my own control protocol (though it's
already done, albeit in somewhat of a weird way...

 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"never speak disrespectfully of society.
 only people who can't get into it do that."
                                                        -- oscar wilde

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)

Reply to: