Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Raphael Geissert a écrit :
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> On 02/01/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>>> Though after a second thought, -dbg should probably not have empty
>>> Depends line.
>> After a third thought, I still fail to see what that has to do with
>> being Architecture: all or any.
> Quoting my self (first message):
>> This is usually bug either because of a missing Depends or because the
>> package should be Architecture: all.
I fail to see why. Imagine for example a -dev package providing only .h
files, but depending on the architecture. It has to be Architecture: any
and does not need to Depends on a package.
You really have to look at the contents of the package and verify it
does not change between architecture.
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' email@example.com | firstname.lastname@example.org
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net