[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:16:21PM +0000, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 02/01/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >   Though after a second thought, -dbg should probably not have empty
> > Depends line.
> After a third thought, I still fail to see what that has to do with
> being Architecture: all or any.

  I agree. My point is, listing packages with an empty Depends: line
isn't meaningless. The total lack of data-massaging _is_ a mistake

·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpqvVaAwU_hM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: