Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:58:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Just to clarify to everybody, the list was screwed up by dd-list (my bad,
> didn't see the '-b' option part). Thanks to Adeodato for pointing that out.
> So, here's the list of binary packages (attachment is dd-list -u again).
This list looks alot better, but still seems to contains atleast
1 that have a Depends field:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <email@example.com>
> libgnomecanvas2-0 (U)