Re: MTA comparison (postfix, exim4, ...)
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> Personally, what made me stick to Exim so far is the ability to
> >> configure retry behavior on a per-domain basis. One of my mail servers
> >
> > Postfix does that too. You direct the domains to a different transport, and
> > setup that transport with whichever parameters you want.
>
> I don't think you can specify a transport-specific retry time. Retry
> times are global, and there's just one queue manager. A specific
> configuration example would be helpful.
Oops, you're correct. What you can do is: subscribe the relevant domains to
the fast flush service, and using a crontab, flush the domains you want
using postqueue -s.
It is almost the same as an ETRN, as it was said previously in this thread.
My bad.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to:
- References:
- MTA comparison (postfix, exim4, ...)
- From: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>
- Re: MTA comparison (postfix, exim4, ...)
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>
- Re: MTA comparison (postfix, exim4, ...)
- From: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>
- Re: MTA comparison (postfix, exim4, ...)
- From: Miles Bader <miles.bader@necel.com>
- Re: MTA comparison (postfix, exim4, ...)
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: MTA comparison (postfix, exim4, ...)
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: MTA comparison (postfix, exim4, ...)
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>