Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote:
> The debian-legal checklist:
[...]
> In the example Don presented, of the Debian star maintainer removing
> some output from the Debian star package, that the star upstream claims
> constitutes a "copyright notice", then there are the following options:
[ rather long essay snipped ]
Confident assertion of legal facts, with little basis, no references,
and without an "IANAL" disclaimer, or "I am a lawyer and this is legal
advice", or a "I am a lawyer but this does not constitute legal advice":
"little basis" seems overly subjective to me, but besides that:
Check
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>