On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:54:09PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:05:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > >> > >> > Well, the ~ character is stated to be evaluated to be less than the > >> > empty string. If a package is the target of a security upload in > >> > stable, you can be certain that the testing/unstable version will also > >> > increase when the new package is introduced to fix the problem there as > >> > well. > >> > >> What if it's a NMU? > >> > > Well, an NMU would go into unstable directly and not into stable. > > Yes, but the version in stable (x.y.z-(w+1)~lenny1) would be higher than the > one in unstable (x.y.z-w.n) > OK. I misread your question. I was not thinking of the security issue being fixed in unstable by a NMU. Good point. I'm stumped. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature