Re: /etc/udev/rules.d non-symlinks
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007, Joey Hess wrote:
> The intent is to let users disable a udev rule by removing the symlink, or
> reorder a rule to a different number by renaming the symlink. Putting a rules
> conffile directly in /etc/udev/rules.d/ wouldn't allow for this, and as Marco
> says in #359614, this "may be useful. Or at least appeared to be useful when
> I designed this." My question is simply whether anyone actually finds this
> useful?
Can we encode the number in the rule itself? Perhaps in the comments
at the top of the file.
This would allow dpkg to handle numbering changes correctly.
--
Loïc Minier
"For subalterns, saying something intelligent is as risky as saying something
stupid."
Reply to: