On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 12:19:34PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 11/02/07 at 10:29 +0000, Mark Purcell wrote: > > Whilst you might be able to vote without expressing an opinion, > > we already have a documented MIA process. > > > > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-beyond-pkging.en.html#s-mia-qa > > > > I don't think using the single criteria such as DPL voting is a good, > > approach. > > > > By all means those who don't vote, might be candidates, but please > > check the MIA tool to see if people are active before approaching them. > > I totally agree. If I were forced to reduce my involvement in Debian, I > would probably start by losing interest in "politics", since I could > easily trust other, better-informed DD, to make better choices than I > would do. That wouldn't hurt the Debian project, or at least much less > than poorly maintaining my packages. > > Maybe the time before the DPL election could be use to find out how data > from MIA could also be used in this process ? Then you'll get the WaT mail and have a chance to pong. AFAIU this is a criterium to know who to send a WaT mail to, not to force people in MIA. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpYt7m7XojJn.pgp
Description: PGP signature