On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:49:10PM +0000, Luk Claes wrote: > Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Sune Vuorela wrote: > >> On 2007-11-23, Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> wrote: > >>> Well, the d-d-a mail included a list of affected packages. So we had a > >>> clue on how many packages are affected. The list has probably evolved > >>> since september but not by much. > >> Except covering kde now. KDE didn't change that much since september. > > > > Apparently not any more with the dpkg-shlibdeps that implements the exceptions > > that I listed in my first mail... (you know it since you tested it for me) > > > > I'm willing to take some blame, mind you. But I'm just not willing to > > fully revert a decision because some grumpy maintainers are not happy that > > they have some fixing to do (in particular when it looks like they don't > > really understand the issues at hand). > > Nowadays there are better alternatives to uploading to unstable for > archive wide testing IMHO. Uploading to experimental is a good thing to > have some initial testing on many architectures, though I would go for a > rebuild of the whole archive for testing things like this for all > packages... before uploading to unstable. He did a full rebuild, and even posted a list. Though it was for x86 which is a tolerant architecture, and the arch where libtool is the less broken. And also Raphael had the brilliant idea to upload a code more strict than the one used for his tests. Both things render the rebuild he did moot. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpqknybOPh50.pgp
Description: PGP signature