Re: Out-of-tree kernel module popularity

[Hendrik Sattler <post@hendrik-sattler.de>]

Am Donnerstag 25 Oktober 2007 schrieb Vincent Danjean:
> racoon seems to be a replacement for a cisco system (server, NOT client)
>
> I cannot modify the server infrastructure at my work (this can change:
> I'm not the only one annoyed by the cisco client). So racoon does not
> seem to fit as a drop-in free replacement for the cisco vpn client.

No, an IKE daemon is needed on both sides of a IPsec connection (when actually 
using IKE). Not sure if Ciscos can already do IKEv2 (->racoon2 or openIKEv2).

HS