On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 02:37:50AM +0000, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Steve Greenland wrote: > > > On 12-Oct-07, 02:13 (CDT), Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> > > wrote: > >> Proposed workflow > >> ----------------- > >> Suspicious packages are found by combining different metrics into a > >> scoring system: > >> - popcon score > > > > You might need to be a little careful with this one. A package can be > > quite useful to a small audience. I don't have any specific examples, > > but I can imagine such a package that is stable (thus unfrequently > > updated) and might well be the only source of such functionality. Of > > course, such a package wouldn't have a bunch of RC bugs, either. > > I do have an example: dak. Perfect example of a useless buggy package in debian. Anyone needing dak uses the svn snapshot because the one in the archive is old and deprecated. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpoMMvKtmFo9.pgp
Description: PGP signature