Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?
On Tue Sep 25, 2007 at 14:55:47 +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> Ah... Do you mean this mail?
> > am I missing something completely here?
> > mzh@dirac:~/debian/packages$ diff -rNu libdatetime-timezone-perl-0.42-before-dv/ > libdatetime-timezone-perl-0.42 | diffstat
> > changelog | 9
> > control | 4
> > packages | 2
> > patches/001-AKST9AKDT_timezone.patch | 11
> > patches/010-tzdata2007g.patch |38814 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > patches/012-tzdata2007g-tests.patch | 21
> > patches/020-AKST9AKDT_timezone.patch | 11
> > rules | 4
> > update-tzdata.sh | 30
> > 9 files changed, 38890 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> What is your question exactly? Do you mean, the patch is too large or
> what? Can you clarify, what do you really want to ask?
> The package is perfectly correct and the only difference is updated
> timezone database plus the shell script debian/update-tzdata.sh which
> I used for updating plus updated test units for new database.
I don't understand why there is a patch of 38k lines needed to fix ONE
[root@debian /root]# man real-life
No manual entry for real-life