First, please STOP your habit of replying to the same message 4 or 5 times. I will do you the courtesy of reading your first reply, but probably not the rest, I just don't have that kind of time. Your multiple replies rarely add any substance anyway. [icelinux@icelinux.net] >> I think your problem is that you have confused "our priorities are our >> users..." with "our priority is everything icelinux believes might help >> some subset of our users". > > I see, I must have confused "subset of users" with "users". How dare you. You are effectively telling me that, because I care about Debian users, you can tell me what I should do with the time I devote to Debian, merely because you are a user. You are telling me that you know better than I do what I can do to benefit Debian users. Sorry, it doesn't work that way. I will spend my time doing what I think benefits Debian users, which is to fix bugs in existing packages. Not packaging and maintaining every little new thing you tell me to care about. The social contract does not say that the developers are obligated to pay attention as random users dictate their needs and desires. If you want to dictate your needs and desires to me, please reply in private so we can negotiate a contract. I won't do it for free, but I might do it if the price is right. -- Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature