[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#437392: debhelper: subroutine "isnative" in Dh_Lib.pm is confused by NMU of native package

Am Montag, den 13.08.2007, 22:26 +0200 schrieb Julian Andres Klode:
> Am Montag, den 13.08.2007, 15:50 -0400 schrieb Joey Hess:
> > Policy is actually careful to set up the invarient that "-" anywhere in
> > a version number means the package is not native. I don't know why the
> > developers reference choses to ignore that. Is there something wrong
> > with using a version number like "" for native package NMUs?
> > (Being careful to choose one that is well outside the normal range.
> > "1.0.debian.1" if necessary.)
> > 
> I suggest to use <Ver>nmu<NMU>, like 1.0nmu1.
> Some people use version like "" for NMUs of binary packages.
Julian Andres Klode

IRC Nickname:   juliank (Debian/OFTC + Freenode, GimpNet)
Fellow of FSFE: https://www.fsfe.org/en/fellows/jak (No. 1049)
Debian Wiki:    http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode
Ubuntu Wiki:    http://wiki.ubuntu.com/JulianAndresKlode
In Launchpad:   https://launchpad.net/~juliank
My packages:  http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=jak@jak-linux.org
Languages:      German, English, [bit French]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply to: