Re: making debian/copyright machine-interpretable
Sam Hocevar wrote:
That's right, we don't know the licensing terms of binary files.
But if we stop at the "it's not sufficient" argument, we'll never get
anywhere, because it is impossible for a source package to determine the
exact licensing terms of its binary packages. I'll leave that to another
Sorry, I don't want to be a nuisance, but this has been puzzling me for
a few days now - I can't figure out how the license of a binary package
compiled from a source package could not be derived by combining the
licenses of the relevant source files?
Would someone mind giving an example, just to stop it bugging me?