On Monday 30 July 2007 00:15, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 05:09:11PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > If you go to http://bugs.debian.org/hpodder, you will see under the
> > outstanding bugs section, several bugs that have been closed for some
> > time. These bugs remain closed (were not reopened), the BTS page for each
> > bug knows about that, yet they are still listed under the "outstanding
> > bugs" section. Why is that?
> >
> > Examples are #389956, #410630, #419471.
>
> thank hurd-i386 for this. (or any arch where your package does not
> build). I wish the bts would ignore non RC archs by default :|
>
> IOW: always add arch=i386 or arch=amd64 in the request URL, else
> you'll end up with an unusable list of bugs all the time.
Or delete "dist=...". Then bugs that are fixed in *some* version are all
categorised as resolved, I think (which I think is usually adequate).
--
Magnus Holmgren holmgren@lysator.liu.se
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
Attachment:
pgpG630d4yNlR.pgp
Description: PGP signature