[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#433143: ITP: bzr-rebase -- Rebase plugin for Bazaar



On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:38:43 +1000, Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au> said: 

> Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:
>> bzr is an inplementation of Arch, and there are people who have not
>> bought the 'Bazaar VCS Project' koolaid, and still prefer Arch to the
>> new VCS.

> 'bzr' is not an implementation of Arch. At best, it is strongly
> inspired by work the developers did on 'baz', which *was* an
> implementation of Arch.

        That was a typo.  Of course I meant baz is an implementation of
 arch. 

> With the 'bzrtools' package installed, it's (sometimes) possible to do
> a one-way import of existing 'baz' branches or repositories. That's
> useful for those who know they're transitioning to an entirely new
> VCS, and want to do so.

        Err, OK.  Not something I am likely to do, but I can see people
 finding 'bzrtools' useful.

>> Robert Collins wrote:
>> >  * Create a 'bazaar' package which is a metapackage depending on
>> >    bzr,
>> > recommending key plugins, and suggesting others.
>> 
>> This would be a bug.  While I understand you prefer the bzr VCS over
>> Arch, I see no justification for imposing your likes and dislikes
>> over users happily using baz as their version control system.

> I agree; the older 'baz' VCS is what currently gets installed with the
> 'bazaar' package, and the 'bzr' VCS is not a compatible replacement.

        I think if there is no bazaar packaged shipped with lenny (apart
 from being a dummy package to enable the package rename; then in
 lenny + 1 we could use bazaar as the container for bzr, if people so
 desire.

        manoj
-- 
"Come on over here, baby, I want to do a thing with you." A Cop,
arresting a non-groovy person after the revolution, Firesign Theater
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



Reply to: