On Saturday 14 July 2007 22:57, Steve Langasek wrote: > > <fjp> vorlon: Any opinion on #433119? As it is now, this would affect > > testing too as soon as nfs-utils is old enough. > > <vorlon> fjp: get the release team to block the package until > > sysvinit is fixed? > > Ahem, "RW". If you must resort to invoking me in an appeal to > authority, please use accurate citations. :) (I.e., I neither added > such a block, nor declared this to be an RC bug on nfs-utils; I have no > more authority over lenny than you or any other developer.) Sorry, I don't understand. AFAIK the quotation is 100% accurate, unless you were replying to a different comment from me. The only thing that may be wrong is my interpretation of your comment. I took it to mean that you agreed the issue was serious enough to be considered RC and that the release team  would consider a request to block this new version of nfs-utils from migrating if it were made. I don't think I ever implied that you actually set such a block.  I do hope that the RW sill is a member of the release team and also RM also stands for "Release Management" or "Release Managers", especially when used without article...
Description: PGP signature